|
Post by tux_sf on Mar 16, 2007 18:42:46 GMT -5
Thanks, originally, to Jenn! Source: Lisk Manufacturing Co. brochure
Size | Length (in.) | Width (in.) | Height (in.) | Capacity lbs. (fowl/roast) | 0 | 14 1/2 | 9 7/8 | 6 3/4 | 5 / 7 | 1 | 18 | 11 1/4 | 7 1/4 | 10 / 12 | 2 | 18 3/4 | 12 | 7 7/8 | 12 / 15 | 3 | 19 1/2 | 12 1/2 | 8 1/4 | 16 / 18 | 4 | 20 1/4 | 13 1/2 | 8 3/4 | 18 / 20 | 5 | 21 1/8 | 14 3/8 | 10 1/4 | 24 / 30 |
Four sizes, Nos. 2-5 inclusive, are also made with chrome plated drop end handles which reduces overall length 1 1/2 inches.
Nos. 0,1,2 and 4 are made in ivory, black trim and are 1/2 inch wider than the blue.
|
|
|
Post by chipperhiker on Mar 16, 2007 20:21:56 GMT -5
Thanks for posting this, Tux-sf!!! Notes below added 11/16/2015: The charts are for exterior dimensions, including rims and handles.I just remeasured my #0 and #1 LISKs, and was reminded of some important roaster measuring rules, regarding LISK and REED roasters. If you are wanting to acquire a roaster online (meaning you have to go by someone else's measurement) this should help: 1) The most reliable measurement of all is the height of the roaster, measured from countertop to top of lid. Count on this one, as it's easy to describe and measure. 2) The next most reliable measurement is the width of the bottom pan, including the rim. This matches the roaster sizing chart and is relatively reliable, though the pans can distort a bit over time (sides pushed together, or apart by usage, abuse, what have you). Use this data point to confirm what you probably already know from having the roaster height measurement. 3) The last measurement (length) can be wildly inaccurate. It's just kind of a pain to measure. It includes the handles, and you pretty much have to just sight the measurement, or resort to some fussiness. Here's what I do, but it's really not worth the effort. The height and width will get you where you need to be on the LISK chart. There are other ways, of course, but I use 2 carpenter's squares to get the length. Even though I've now done a fairly accurate measurement this way, this particular roaster is supposed to be 18" long. You can see that my roaster comes in a bit short. Anyway, my point is, you're probably better off ignoring the reported length of a roaster altogether. Go by the height, confirm with the width. If it's the size you're looking for, then the chart will give you a pretty accurate length, if you need to be sure it fits you stove, etc..
|
|
|
Post by tux_sf on Mar 16, 2007 20:29:23 GMT -5
I cheated. . .I simply went to the 'modify' button on my post elsewhere & cut & pasted the code from there to here. Actually, outside of some deletions that was the one thing I wanted to copy over from yonder before I went POOF! since it was a bitch to figure out how to do it last time & I didn't savor the thought of a repeat performance from scratch. OpenOffice ( www.openoffice.org ) is da' bomb if you want a free office suite. Danny
|
|
|
Post by roethlisberger on Sept 22, 2009 10:57:30 GMT -5
Will all sizes fit into a standard Chambers oven?
|
|
|
Post by berlyn on Sept 22, 2009 23:36:41 GMT -5
Will all sizes fit into a standard Chambers oven? For size 5 you take the racks out of the oven and set the roaster on the oven floor.
|
|
|
Post by tux_sf on Sept 23, 2009 0:44:38 GMT -5
Will all sizes fit into a standard Chambers oven? For size 5 you take the racks out of the oven and set the roaster on the oven floor. I've used a 5 in my oven a couple of times for a large turkey (one was something like 23 lbs.). It looks funny because the roaster takes up almost the entire oven space, but it works beautifully. Turkey was moist & delicious CWTGTO!
|
|
|
Post by mcdesign on Nov 9, 2009 12:51:14 GMT -5
Will a Lisk No. 1 fit on the bottom rack with enough space to keep the top rack in for a pie or would you need the smaller No. 0 for that? I measure 7" from bottom to top racks here.
Correction, I remeasured and see that it is EXACTLY 7 1/4" between each. So I have answered my own question.
|
|
|
Post by pipercollins on Nov 15, 2009 12:04:51 GMT -5
Or just put the pie on top of the roaster
|
|
|
Post by marka on Jan 23, 2010 12:11:26 GMT -5
I picked up a small Lisk roaster the other day that measures 11 inches, (inside dimension bottom pan) 81/2 wide and 61/2 tall. It has 2 vents in the lid.
My other small roaster is 12 long by 9 wide 7 tall. Seems Lisk turned out several different sizes over the years.
Both are for sale if anyone is interested.
|
|
|
Post by icookthenieat on Jan 24, 2010 8:30:57 GMT -5
Marka...can you email some pics? Thanx, Bob
|
|
|
Post by lkeriegirl on Oct 22, 2010 17:04:27 GMT -5
My oven is only 18" deep, or am i crazy?
I must have a zero already, but i don;t think i can use anything bigger than the #1. . . . is that measurement including the handles, Tux?
(FWIW, I have a B silverlite)
|
|
|
Post by cinnabar on Oct 22, 2010 20:55:40 GMT -5
Not too crazy. Mine is the same. Can only use half cookie sheets in it. I used my lisk a #3 or #4? ( 8 1/2"tall, 12+" wide and 20" long including handles, ) and did a 22lb bird last Easter. It was a full pan. Toooo good. Like Beryln says, put the roaster on the floor of the oven and at an angle if you need more space. It will fit. Not the best pic, but you get the idea. cinn
|
|
|
Post by lkeriegirl on Oct 24, 2010 21:03:09 GMT -5
Ahh, angle it [slaps forehead]. Thank you!
|
|
|
Post by hunzi on Oct 26, 2010 23:54:07 GMT -5
For those of you with multiple sized Lisks - will any of them nest together? I'm thinking of storage factors.
Always ;-) Hunzi
|
|
|
Post by cinnabar on Oct 27, 2010 15:56:17 GMT -5
Mine do not, I have a 1 and 3. If they were further apart in size they might, say a 0 and a 4. Just a guess though. You can store other items inside them to make the space more effcient. cinn
|
|
|
Post by divecchio on Oct 27, 2010 20:05:33 GMT -5
I have a 0, 1 & 3....the zero will fit into the one, but when the lid of the one is on, it sits about 1/2" higher than it should be, but it still works .......the 0 fits easily in the 3.......the 1 will fit into the 3, but the lid of the 3 is stopped from going all the way down by the handle of the 1 and it's kind of cockeyed - not as comfortable as you'd like it, i think........hope this all makes sense!
|
|
|
Post by 58limited on Oct 27, 2010 22:56:16 GMT -5
I have four, I am able to nest two of them into the other two which really helps with storage. I have a No. 0, 1, 3, and one smaller than a No. 0.
The 13" (11 1/2" w/o handles) roaster is perfect for "meals for two." It is the perfect size to cook two Cornish hens.
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie on Dec 14, 2011 14:37:59 GMT -5
OK, gang, just want your HONEST opinion on this. What number Lisk would you estimate this to be? And here's another pic: I bought this off of eBay on "make an offer" for $25.00, thinking (in my opinion and by what the tape SHOWED) that it was a No. 0. The S.O.B. came in the mail today--EIGHTEEN inches long, and 7 3/4" HIGH. My question is, do I have a beef w/this guy to where I can go back on him through eBay? This is roaster NUMBER SIX that I have bought off of eBay for similar BS on the way folks "measure" them--all six this same size, where they gave measurements of an "O". This guy was just flat out FLAGRANT in misrepresentation in MY opinion by the way he held the tape. No measurements were given in the written description. Your thoughts? Signed, P.O.'d Chuckie
|
|
|
Post by sporko on Dec 14, 2011 15:16:48 GMT -5
My first thought is: Does he have another buyer that is opening a box expecting a 7 3/4x18 and thinking "Damn, this thing is too small."
|
|
|
Post by pooka on Dec 14, 2011 15:17:19 GMT -5
From those two pictures, I'd say it was a "0". The bottom of mine measures 12 1/2" long & overall is 6 3/4" tall. The first on I bought, they gave similar measurements. It turned out to be a #1. I think they were measuring the inside.
That's the down side of buying stuff online. You have to trust the seller & make sure to get good & accurate info. I've walked away from a lot of deal because I wasn't sure about it & the description wasn't clear enough or the pictures weren't good enough.
If I can't see both ends of the tape measure, I don't trust the reading. Unfortunately, It the old buyer beware. You have a beef but I do't now what yo can do about it.
|
|
|
Post by pooka on Dec 14, 2011 15:21:23 GMT -5
I didn't think of "the old switcheroo". That is a possibility.
|
|
|
Post by karitx on Dec 14, 2011 15:43:45 GMT -5
The one in the picture sure looks like a 0. It looks too short from vent to vent to be 18" across. I would email the seller pointing out the real measurements versus the ones in the photo and ask if you received the right one. Maybe you can get a refund.
I've bought a 0 and a 4 so far and in both cases I had to ask for extra pictures and measurements because their descriptions were so vague.
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie on Dec 14, 2011 15:44:03 GMT -5
From those two pictures, I'd say it was a "0". The bottom of mine measures 12 1/2" long & overall is 6 3/4" tall. The first on I bought, they gave similar measurements. It turned out to be a #1. I think they were measuring the inside. That's the down side of buying stuff online. You have to trust the seller & make sure to get good & accurate info. I've walked away from a lot of deal because I wasn't sure about it & the description wasn't clear enough or the pictures weren't good enough. If I can't see both ends of the tape measure, I don't trust the reading. Unfortunately, It the old buyer beware. You have a beef but I do't now what yo can do about it. The other FIVE I bought, one was "Buy It Now" for like $18, S/H included, so I jumped right on it because all three pieces were there, and the price!! I DID buy one downtown @ the mall that same size because it was only $8.00! THREE I bought on eBay, the folks said, "Well, I measured it as best I knew how, I don't think you have any right to complain". THAT'S when I started thinking, I'm gonna make DAMN SURE on the sizes b4 I buy anymore!!! When he had the tape up to it like that, I was pretty damned certain of the size--or so I thought!!!
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie on Dec 14, 2011 18:45:04 GMT -5
I suppose all's well that ends well--here's what the eBayer responded: I will just give you a full refund with refunded shipping. Keep the pot. I must have shipped a smaller less expensive one to someone who bought the one you have. I am surprised they did not say something since they paid more. No need to send it back sorry for the mistake. It was the only one I had left of the three & I just assumed it was the correct size. Thank youThe refund has already showed up on my account, so, again, I am happy that they made right on the deal. Sounds like Sporko's assumption may be correct-- BUT as an aside--the vents in the eBay pix are stuck in the same position on the roaster I rec'd... IF I ever sell one of the stoves I have, I've made my self a vow that I will gift this particular pan to the buyer. Same deal even if I give it away to a family member. It cost me nothing so I shall pass it on... Chuckie
|
|
|
Post by sporko on Dec 14, 2011 22:28:19 GMT -5
Sounds like Sporko's assumption may be correct-- BUT as an aside--the vents in the eBay pix are stuck in the same position on the roaster I rec'd... Chuckie I will be picking stocks and locating lost children later this evening. But I shall nap first, as my first prediction has made me tired.
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie on Dec 15, 2011 10:26:00 GMT -5
Sounds like Sporko's assumption may be correct-- BUT as an aside--the vents in the eBay pix are stuck in the same position on the roaster I rec'd... Chuckie I will be picking stocks and locating lost children later this evening. But I shall nap first, as my first prediction has made me tired. ROFLMFAO!!! Thank you, oh great Swami!!!
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie on Jun 25, 2012 13:29:31 GMT -5
I'm looking for the insert (tray) for the large Lisk Roaster (the #5---approx. 21 x 14 x 10.25). I just scored that "BIG Muther" on eBay for $26.43, including S/H!! ;D Looks brand spanking new!!! Except NO tray. I've seen the trays come up from time to time, so thought I'd take my chances. I just didn't want this big'un to get away! Here's a coupla pix: CHEERS! Chuckie
|
|
|
Post by violet65 on Jun 26, 2012 0:17:11 GMT -5
Nice!
|
|
|
Post by wannaredun on Jan 30, 2014 12:36:38 GMT -5
I think I have the tray for that. Do you know what the tray dimensions would be? I've been holding on to it on the theory that I'll find the roaster, but so far...
|
|
|
Post by Chuckie on May 14, 2017 9:59:28 GMT -5
|
|